Scientific Atlanta, Inc. has been a leading manufacturer of set-top cable boxes and other satellite transmission equipment. Long a leader in the design and manufacturing of satellite earth station antennas, Scientific Atlanta grew rapidly in the 1970’s as a result of its involvement in the cable television market, only to scale back and restructure its business operations in the 1980’s. In the 1990’s, the company was one of the first to invest heavily in developing interactive digital cable technology.
Skybrokers offers for over the 10 years Scientific Atlanta (Cisco) modulators and encoders as well as Scientific Atlanta (ViaSat, Inc.) Earth Station Antennas, new and used. We can provide turnkey solutions, refurbishment and upgrades. We have supported several clients with new and used antennas as well as antenna parts. We have installed over the years many antennas such as the 6.1m Ku-band, 7.3m Ku-band, 9.0m and 11.3m C-band.
Scientific Atlanta, Inc. was founded on October 31st, 1951, by Six engineers at the Georgia Institute of Technology: James E. Boyd, Charles Griffin, Robert E. Honer, Gerald Rosselot, Lamar Whittle and Vernon R. Widerquist who each invested 100 USD. In late 1952 Glen P. Robinson became the 7th member. The group was hoping to market a device that recorded the patterns of antennas. By 1956 the fledgling firm had completed development of its first product, built its first plant and amassed 30 employees.
During the 1960’s Scientific Atlanta earned a place in the space and defense industries as a manufacturer of electronic testing equipment for antennas. By the end of that decade the company had added instruments for testing telephones and acoustic devices with defense applications. As a military contractor, the company distinguished itself by manufacturing unique electronic instruments for the federal government.
Scientific Atlanta applied its energy to opportunities in new fields with large growth potential and few barriers to entry. The company sought out products that were either low-cost and high volume or had a very high price tag.
Growing with Cable in the 1970’s
In 1971 Sidney Topol, an executive at the Raytheon Company with a background in physics and satellite technology, was named president of Scientific Atlanta. A fervent believer in strategic planning, Topol set out to double the size of Scientific Atlanta by implementing a long-term program. The first tenet of this plan was to reduce or sell off operations in which the company was losing money trying to beat much larger companies at their own game. Scientific Atlanta’s tentative interest in microwave carriers, for example, fell into this category, so Topol phased it out.
Within Scientific Atlanta, Topol held a variety of positions. He was the company president from 1971-1983, the CEO from 1975-1987 and chairman of the board from 1978-1990.
The answer to the question was telecommunications products, primarily the Satellite Earth Station Antenna, a large mobile dish used to receive signals transmitted from communications satellites orbiting the earth. In 1973 the company displayed a portable Satellite Earth Station Antenna at a communications trade show in California. It planned to sell the portable stations to companies in the relatively new and rapidly growing cable television field so they could transmit their programming to a large number of stations in different areas. The stations, in turn, would send the programming to consumers’ homes over their cable networks. At the time, however, observers told Scientific Atlanta executives that satellite transmission of cable television programming would take place only in the distant future.
These predictions proved incorrect and as the cable television industry boomed in the mid- to late 1970’s, Scientific Atlanta grew with it. The company’s profits increased by 40% a year from 1972 on as the company came to dominate the market it had largely pioneered.
The company sold two-thirds of the 3,000 Satellite Earth Station Antennas purchased by cable companies during the 1970’s, enabling its clients, broadcasters such as Home Box Office (HBO) and Showtime/The Movie Channel, to become pillars of the cable broadcasting industry. Scientific Atlanta’s strength in Satellite Earth Station Antennas helped to enhance its overall sales of cable television equipment and the company also began to market other components necessary to operate a cable television system.
In addition to its satellite products for the cable industry, Scientific Atlanta manufactured testing and measuring devices for telecommunications, industrial and laboratory use. The company added to its instrumentation operations when it acquired the San Diego-based Spectral Dynamics Corporation, a manufacturer of scientific devices, in 1978 for 17.4 million USD.
Spectral Dynamics brought with it European sales subsidiaries in Germany, France, the UK and The Netherlands and boasted a sales network that covered 40 countries and was supported by a worldwide service network that adjusted and repaired its instruments.
By the end of 1978 Scientific Atlanta’s sales had reached 94.2 million USD. In addition to four plants in Atlanta, the company had opened facilities in Alabama, New Jersey and Scotland. The following year the company added to its testing equipment holdings when it purchased Adar Associates, Inc., a company based in Burlington, Massachusetts, that manufactured automatic testing devices.
By the start of 1979 Scientific Atlanta employed 2,700 people. That year the company also introduced Homesat, a subsidiary formed to market satellite equipment to homeowners who lived in areas too remote to receive adequate TV reception. The service’s first customer, a New Mexico ranch owner, paid 20,000 USD to set up his own Satellite Earth Station.
By the dawn of the 1980’s Scientific Atlanta had become the world’s largest supplier of Satellite Earth Station Antennas. The company moved to increase its cable-related operations when it bought cable manufacturer Systems Communications Cable, Inc., based in Phoenix, Arizona in a 5.5 million USD deal.
Bottoming Out in the 1980’s
Scientific Atlanta’s dominance of the cable television equipment field began to waver in the early 1980’s when the company developed quality control problems with its set-top converters, units placed on top of television sets to facilitate the broadcast of cable channels. These difficulties caused Scientific Atlanta its first quarterly loss in 13 years at the end of June 1982. Eventually, Scientific Atlanta was forced to abandon the manufacture of set-top converters in its American plants and contract the Japanese electronics firm, Matsushita, to have them made overseas.
In 1983 Scientific Atlanta’s fortunes took a decisive turn for the worse when the bottom dropped out of the cable industry. In its infancy, cable services had grown feverishly, but the business had now matured and slowed and in the early 1980’s cable entered a period of consolidation. As companies went out of business or were swallowed up by others, the demand for cable satellite transmission equipment dropped dramatically.
In late 1984 Scientific Atlanta was dealt another blow when it failed to win a contract from the HBO and Showtime cable operations to develop equipment to scramble their signals, which homeowners were pirating out of the sky with their own satellite dishes. With this decision, the company’s competitor, MA/Com, Inc., earned the right to market the technology that would set the standard for all future scrambling of cable satellite transmissions. Scientific Atlanta found itself knocked out of the leading role in the industry it had largely invented.
Facing this roadblock head on, the company decided to investigate other markets. In June 1985 the company announced that it would introduce a new line of products in the area of business communications. Using a newly developed satellite dish, the “very small aperture terminal” or VSAT, which dispatched and received encoded signals transmitted in a new, highly reliable “KU” broadcast band width (Ku-band), the company proposed to market private video networks to large corporations; with Scientific Atlanta’s equipment, companies could transmit high-quality video images from their headquarters to branch offices or between field offices through satellite technology. Meetings, demonstrations, training sessions, and other types of programming and data could be more easily conveyed from one location to another. By offering video transmission, in addition to the ability to convey raw data such as figures and documents over fiber-optic telephone lines, Scientific Atlanta hoped to make its system more useful and appealing to businesses than those of its competitors in the telecommunications industry.
In the early stages of the project, Scientific Atlanta signed up nearly a dozen companies for its service, including General Motors and J.C. Penney. Despite these successes, however, analysts remained skeptical that there would be sufficient demand for Scientific Atlanta’s elaborate and expensive service to make the company’s investment in the project pay off. Moreover, the company’s lack of affiliation with any major satellite company to provide the other crucial link in its network caused worry.
Retooling in 1986
By 1986 Scientific Atlanta’s efforts at rejuvenation had in fact faltered. Operating profits dropped dramatically as the company “ran into very competitive markets,” Chairman Topol told the Wall Street Journal. In an effort to stem Scientific Atlanta’s decline, Topol brought in an outside consultant, William E. Johnson, to take over the helm and help the company restructure itself and return to profitability. Scientific Atlanta “had grown so fast in technology and marketing that it grew short on logistics,” one board member informed the New York Times.
To Johnson, Scientific Atlanta’s problems stemmed from years of rapid growth, during which the company had become involved in a large number of new technologies, none of which it managed well. In addition, bureaucratic red tape had mushroomed to hamper financial reporting systems and as a result Scientific Atlanta had taken its eye off the bottom line; competition in the industry was getting fierce, and the company’s costs were spiraling. These conditions were caused in part by unsound personnel decisions.
With Johnson at its command post Scientific Atlanta embarked on a process he called “retooling, refocusing, and restructuring,” according to the Wall Street Transcript. The company withdrew from a number of operational areas, selling seven out of 25 of its business ventures, including its home satellite business and coaxial cable subsidiary. Partly as a result of these changes the company posted a net loss in 1986 of 9.2 million USD.
Once rid of its less promising areas of operation, Scientific Atlanta focused on more profitable concerns, such as its satellite communications networks. The company enhanced its holdings in this field when it bought Advanced Communications Engineering, which helped Scientific-Atlanta take second place in this growing field. Despite the earlier skepticism of industry analysts, the company discovered a strong demand for satellite communications networks among corporations and in developing nations, where land-based cable communications systems were prohibitively expensive.
Meanwhile, Scientific Atlanta’s traditional market for its satellite equipment, the cable television industry, began to show signs of life, particularly in Europe. To formulate other successful products Scientific Atlanta began to pour renewed effort and money into research and development, revamping many of its product lines with all new technology to keep the company on the cutting edge of the industry. A particular area of growth was in commercial applications of HD television technology, which helped the company broaden its customer base.
Not content to simply alter its product lines, Scientific Atlanta also moved to significantly control its costs. The company pared its workforce, firing 1,000 workers, and instituted a wage freeze. To reduce problems in its manufacturing operations, the company replaced its domestic assembly lines with cellular manufacturing teams. In an effort to control expenses at its overseas manufacturing outfits, Scientific Atlanta worked out an agreement with its Japanese supplier to reduce the impact of currency fluctuations on its bottom line. Along with these changes, Scientific Atlanta eliminated three-quarters of its senior-level management; this turnover allowed the company to revamp its corporate culture, reducing the number of financial reports necessary by two-thirds and incorporating engineers in the early stages of new-product design in an effort to control manufacturing costs. Productivity was increased and the time it took to manufacture many items shrank markedly.
Despite these changes, however, Scientific Atlanta’s instrument divisions, which manufactured equipment for testing and monitoring, remained insufficiently profitable. Nonetheless, by the beginning of the 1990’s the company’s overall performance had improved dramatically as earnings increased 121% over the last half of the previous decade to reach 36 million USD in 1989 and rose again to hit 44.3 million USD one year later.
In the 1990’s Scientific Atlanta continued its aggressive development of new technologies to improve its market share. In early 1991 the company introduced a satellite network for smaller businesses and began to market signal encoding devices to a number of companies. Still, a general economic recession, intensified by cuts in cable industry spending, resulted in a 20% drop in sales for the year. As a result, Scientific Atlanta planned further restructuring in the form of staff cuts and consolidation of manufacturing operations; but the cost involved in these moves reduced the company’s earnings for 1991 to only 1.1 million USD. Despite this bad news Scientific Atlanta’s directors remained hopeful that the company would prosper in years to come as it made efforts to reconfirm its record of technological innovation and aggressive marketing.
Betting on Digital in the 1990’s
James F. McDonald, a 21-year IBM veteran originally from Kentucky, took over as CEO in July 1993. McDonald had overseen layoffs and consolidations at Gould, Inc., a 1 billion USD electronics firm, several years earlier. The Atlanta Constitution reported he faced an analogous situation at Scientific Atlanta, which lacked a clear focus across its broad product line. The cable industry, which accounted for most of the company’s business, provided the company a focus. By 1997, the company would sell off several units including its venerable microwave instrumentations unit.
In January 2000, Scientific Atlanta sold its satellite networking division to Viasat, Inc. for 75 million USD. With the sale, Scientific Atlanta would focus on technology for interactive services to consumers. McDonald also consolidated manufacturing and administrative functions across the company’s divisions.
Scientific Atlanta signed development deals with numerous providers, hoping to win an early lead in the emerging interactive television business. However, the company’s main competitor, market leader General Instrument (GI), found quick profits producing cheap set-top boxes for analog cable systems and digital boxes. However, Scientific Atlanta had hedged its bets: the company was also developing software and two-way fiber for use by cable companies. In 1994, the company invested in PowerTV, a Cupertino, California start-up that was developing software and graphics hardware for various makes of digital set-top boxes.
Scientific Atlanta expanded throughout 1999 as demand for both its Explorer cable box and its stock grew. However, GI’s lower priced devices were attracting more cable systems. These allowed for the extra channels available through digital cable, but not for full interactivity such as cable telephony and web surfing. These features, noted McDonald, provided cable networks an advantage over satellite broadcasters.
Explorers sales rose in 2000, and so did sales of satellite transmission products. The company signed several international deals, equipping cable providers in the UK, Germany and Argentina with transmission equipment. Set-top boxes were going to the UK and Canada.
By mid-2001, Scientific Atlanta had increased its workforce by a third, to 12,000 employees. In the works was a plan to bring NTN Communications’ popular interactive trivia service, typically found in bars, to home cable boxes.
Share price was cut in half in the summer of 2001 as orders dropped. Angry investors, incensed by McDonald and others selling off millions of dollars worth of shares, filed 16 different lawsuits alleging misleading statements in the company’s March Q3 reports.
Scientific Atlanta began laying off workers at its Juarez, Mexico plant due to the slowdown in business. However, some still felt there was room for growth, as only 22% of US cable customers were expected to have digital service by the end of 2001.
In 2005 Cisco Systems acquired Scientific Atlanta. This was Cisco’s largest acquisition in a deal valued at 6.9 billion USD. Scientific Atlanta became a division within Cisco’s routing and service provider group and was operating as a separate business unit being a leading supplier of digital content contribution and distribution systems, transmission networks for broadband access to the home, digital interactive set-tops and subscriber systems designed for video, high-speed Internet and VoIP networks.
In 2008 the manufacturing and IP rights for the Scientific Atlanta/Viasat Model 8345 (4.5m) Satellite Antenna was sold to Superior Satellite Engineers (SSE) based in the USA. This popular antenna had set the industry standard for performance, stability and reliability since its production roll-out in 1983.
In 2008 Scientific Atlanta was honored for the Technology & Engineering Emmy Award for development, productization and commercialization of interactive Video-on-Demand at the International Consumer Electronics Show (CES) in Las Vergas.
In November 2015 Cisco sold Scientific Atlanta (Cisco’s Connected Devices Division) to French multinational Technicolor SA. (formerly Thomson SARL and Thomson Multimedia), a worldwide technology leader in the media and entertainment sector, in an attempt to re-align Cisco’s focus on its core areas of growth. The sale of Scientific Atlanta business Unit was closed for 602 million USD and marked a stunning financial exit for Cisco after a decade of trying to build the business. Technicolor integrated the Cisco Connected Devices assets in its organization.
1951: Scientific Atlanta is founded by a group of engineers at the Georgia Institute of Technology
1971: New President Sidney Topol sets out to double company’s size.
1972: Co-founder Gerald Rosselot died on 12 August 1972.
1980: Scientific Atlanta is world’s largest supplier of satellite earth station antennas.
1986: Scientific Atlanta begins “retooling, refocusing” under new CEO William Johnson.
1993: James McDonald becomes CEO, overseas large investment in interactive digital cable technology.
1998: Co-founder James E. Boyd died.
2000: Scientific Atlanta expands production several times as digital business booms.
2000: Scientific Atlanta Satellite Networking Business is sold to Viasat, Inc. for USD 75 million cash to focus more on technology for interactive services to consumers.
2001: Share price falls and layoffs are announced in the wake of falling orders.
2005: Scientific Atlanta is acquired by Cisco Systems in a USD 6.9 million cash deal. Scientific Atlanta was operating as a separate business unit under the Cisco umbrella.
2008: The IP rights for the popular Scientific Atlanta/Viasat 4.5m antenna model 8345 are sold to US-based Superior Satellite Engineers (SSE).
2008: The Company is honored for the Technology & Engineering Emmy Awards for development, productization and commercialization of interactive Video-on-Demand at the International Consumer Electronics Show (CES) in Las Vergas.
2013: Co-founder Glen P. Robinson died on 16 January 2013 at an age of 89.
2015: Cisco sold the Scientific Atlanta division (Cisco’s Connected Devices Division) to Technicolor, an international provider of media and entertainment technology and services, based in France.
All trademarks, logos and images mentioned and showed on this page are property of their respective owners.
www.nytimes.com edition January 20th, 2000
www.digitalbroadcasting.com edition January 24th, 2000
www.marketwired.com edition April 16th, 2007
www.reuters.com edition July 23rd, 2015